<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Migrating VM from VMware Server 1.0.x to ESXi 3.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cmoud.com/2008/12/21/migrating-vm-from-vmware-server-10x-to-esxi-35/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cmoud.com/2008/12/21/migrating-vm-from-vmware-server-10x-to-esxi-35/</link>
	<description>computers in hell all run linux</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 23:33:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mart</title>
		<link>http://cmoud.com/2008/12/21/migrating-vm-from-vmware-server-10x-to-esxi-35/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>mart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmoud.com/?p=24#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I agree, I find Hyper-V more friendly and easier to use, it is free product and does its work quite well. It might not have all the extra special functions of ESX but I don&#039;t think it was meant to be the direct competition (at least not at this moment).

I have a feeling that all non-Windows products suffer from some kind of &#039;we are not just for anyone, we are special, so we don&#039;t have to be user friendly&#039; attitude.

On the other side, there are two things that Hyper-V requires - x64 server with CPU&#039;s that support virtualization (some C2D lack this, but those are not for servers anyway) and Vista/2008 Server for the Hyper-V Manager. ESXi runs on almost anything, including ancient s603 Xeons.

Since I was too lazy to migrate from VMware to Hyper-V, I chose this way - I didn&#039;t expect it to be so painful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I find Hyper-V more friendly and easier to use, it is free product and does its work quite well. It might not have all the extra special functions of ESX but I don&#8217;t think it was meant to be the direct competition (at least not at this moment).</p>
<p>I have a feeling that all non-Windows products suffer from some kind of &#8216;we are not just for anyone, we are special, so we don&#8217;t have to be user friendly&#8217; attitude.</p>
<p>On the other side, there are two things that Hyper-V requires &#8211; x64 server with CPU&#8217;s that support virtualization (some C2D lack this, but those are not for servers anyway) and Vista/2008 Server for the Hyper-V Manager. ESXi runs on almost anything, including ancient s603 Xeons.</p>
<p>Since I was too lazy to migrate from VMware to Hyper-V, I chose this way &#8211; I didn&#8217;t expect it to be so painful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Bankhead</title>
		<link>http://cmoud.com/2008/12/21/migrating-vm-from-vmware-server-10x-to-esxi-35/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bankhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmoud.com/?p=24#comment-42</guid>
		<description>I just did this last week and found out what you did.  And because of this problem, I decided to stop using VMWare from this point on and stadardized on Hyper-V.  ESXi seems great, but what these guys forget is the ease of use and manageability makes the product!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just did this last week and found out what you did.  And because of this problem, I decided to stop using VMWare from this point on and stadardized on Hyper-V.  ESXi seems great, but what these guys forget is the ease of use and manageability makes the product!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
